Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361845/29726/18] Posted by Timmer at 08:44, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I understand that Gloucester drivers have had Melksham work removed with the change of timetable. Along with Bristol drivers losing Weymouth, it would appear Westbury depot are too thin to cover all the gaps.
Explains why Weymouth trains often end up terminating at Westbury in both directions if Bristol drivers no longer sign the route down to Weymouth. Might be good for operators but not good for passengers.Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361844/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 08:18, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Friday May 30
08:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 10:25.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9.
Last Updated:30/05/2025 05:59
Not a good week for this to be short-formed : it's half-term and this is the first train for cheap off-peak tickets.Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9.
Last Updated:30/05/2025 05:59
I was on it on Wednesday, when it was a 9-car set; we had the "move any bags off the seats - people are standing" announcement before Oxford.
17:34 London Paddington to Hereford due 20:25 will be started from Oxford.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:30/05/2025 07:13
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:30/05/2025 07:13
Re: Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? In "Fare's Fair" [361843/30308/4] Posted by grahame at 08:18, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you know full well that Jenrick is referring mainly to ....
You have me - I know what I think he meant. As his words were reported it suggested he was looking to throw out the baby with the bathwater ...
Personal annoyance - too many announcements in the quiet carriage, including those telling us to keep quiet in that carriage - "do as I say, not as I do ..."
Re: Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? In "Fare's Fair" [361842/30308/4] Posted by bobm at 07:51, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is covered in paragraph 7 of the Railway Byelaws
7. Music, sound, advertising and carrying on a trade
except with written permission from an operator no person on the railway shall, to the annoyance of any person:
sing or
use any instrument, article or equipment for the production or reproduction of sound
except with written permission from an operator no person on the railway shall, to the annoyance of any person:
sing or
use any instrument, article or equipment for the production or reproduction of sound
Don’t start me on mobile phone calls. Increasingly you get people holding their phone flat, on loudspeaker and talking into the bottom of it as though they are on the Apprentice!
Re: Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? In "Fare's Fair" [361841/30308/4] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 07:42, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you know full well that Jenrick is referring mainly to the individuals who think it OK to play 'music', or have loud conversations, on public transport without benefit of headphones.
Even if you don't appreciate piano music I fail to understand why anybody would object to the use of a public piano by a reasonably competent player.
I would assume that 'flash mob performances' at public transport sites are already deemed illegal by relevant byelaws; if not they should be made so forthwith.
'Chipping away at society'? Not really but perhaps a civil law 'charge' of being bloody annoying in a public place would be useful.

Re: Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? In "Fare's Fair" [361840/30308/4] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:35, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The BBC
Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? ... I can recall a member of this forum and a well respected campaigner playing a violin - or was it a viola - at the opening of Ashley Down, public pianos at a number of stations, and flash mob performances that seem to enhance people's experiences ...
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said he hopes his video confronting fare evaders on the London Underground will "shame people into action".
Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live's Matt Chorley, Jenrick said activities such as fare dodging along with graffiti and playing music on public transport were "chipping away at society".
Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live's Matt Chorley, Jenrick said activities such as fare dodging along with graffiti and playing music on public transport were "chipping away at society".
Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? ... I can recall a member of this forum and a well respected campaigner playing a violin - or was it a viola - at the opening of Ashley Down, public pianos at a number of stations, and flash mob performances that seem to enhance people's experiences ...
Huge difference between buskers and those playing music "live" at stations who are often talented musicians which enhances and adds character and ignorant so and sos blasting out (most often in my experience) rap "music" from their smartphones on the train because they're too inconsiderate to wear headphones and .....well......they're entitled, aren't they?

(Early morning rant over!)
Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? In "Fare's Fair" [361839/30308/4] Posted by grahame at 07:21, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The BBC
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has said he hopes his video confronting fare evaders on the London Underground will "shame people into action".
Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live's Matt Chorley, Jenrick said activities such as fare dodging along with graffiti and playing music on public transport were "chipping away at society".
Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live's Matt Chorley, Jenrick said activities such as fare dodging along with graffiti and playing music on public transport were "chipping away at society".
Is playing music on public transport "Chipping away at Society"? ... I can recall a member of this forum and a well respected campaigner playing a violin - or was it a viola - at the opening of Ashley Down, public pianos at a number of stations, and flash mob performances that seem to enhance people's experiences ...
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361838/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 07:12, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I understand that Gloucester drivers have had Melksham work removed with the change of timetable. Along with Bristol drivers losing Weymouth, it would appear Westbury depot are too thin to cover all the gaps.
There are ... times ... I wish I had provided an "amazed" button answer as well as a "like" button. If you have understood correctly (and I have no reason to doubt it) it looks to be rather backward step in terms of providing a reliable service, doesn't it?
Has the new timetable change sorted out the lunchtime problem where a crew arriving off the semi-fast London to Exeter service do a round trip to Swindon ... notorious for being cancelled, turned at Chippenham or delayed if anything goes wrong (does it ever?) between London and Reading, delaying the Exeter.
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361837/29726/18] Posted by Wizard at 07:03, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I understand that Gloucester drivers have had Melksham work removed with the change of timetable. Along with Bristol drivers losing Weymouth, it would appear Westbury depot are too thin to cover all the gaps.
Telegraph wires In "Railway History and related topics" [361836/30307/55] Posted by grahame at 05:56, 30th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now here's something you don't see in the UK these days - pretty unusual elsewhere too and I have posted them in "History" rather that heritage things you can see and enjoy.
This from Poland on the line from Lithuania - the sole rail link (if you can call it that with the change in gauge between the two countries). "Rail Baltica" will link from Poland across Lithuania and Latvia and on to Tallinn in Estonia and I suspect that in the process the old signalling communications will be replaced.

Re: Interrail, summer 2025 - daily diary thread of our travels In "Introductions and chat" [361835/30276/1] Posted by grahame at 05:28, 30th May 2025 Already liked by PrestburyRoad | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On Tuesday we caught this train ...

On Thursday we ate breakfast at this station ...

If it's Friday it must be ...

... catching the 06:01 train.
Experiences overtake the time to write them all up.
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361834/11010/18] Posted by AMLAG at 21:22, 29th May 2025 Already liked by Oxonhutch, grahame | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Personally and I’m not alone, I can’t see why Go-Op or indeed any Train Operator should have
to be saddled with the cost of upgrading these footpath level crossings.
The route from Thingley Jn to Bradford Jn is routinely used intensively for planned and emergency diversion of a wide variety of trains and identified safety concerns requiring upgrades and installation of Red/Green lights to inform users should be installed at the Infrastructure owner’s (currently Network Rail) expense with possible financial assistance from
outside bodies such as County Councils.
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361833/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 19:40, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 16:23 from Westbury and the 17:35 from Swindon now re-instated.
However
However
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will be started from Swindon.
It will no longer call at Westbury, Trowbridge, Melksham and Chippenham.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will be started from Swindon.
It will no longer call at Westbury, Trowbridge, Melksham and Chippenham.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
20:06 Westbury to Swindon due 21:21
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 20:06 Westbury to Swindon due 21:21.
Additional Information
Four people carriers from Bath Taxis. Before getting in any taxi vehicle please check with the driver that they are working on behalf of GWR, the driver should not ask for payment.
Re: Gravel paths down the sides of Asdas... In "The Lighter Side" [361832/30306/30] Posted by matth1j at 17:02, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(Source of phrase, for anyone who missed it:
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=11010.msg361826#msg361826 )
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361831/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 16:08, 29th May 2025 Already liked by IndustryInsider | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for that. It's wonderful how much specialist knowledge you get here!

And you may regret including that link - you'll get some more dumb questions from this end!
Gravel paths down the sides of Asdas... In "The Lighter Side" [361830/30306/30] Posted by Mark A at 16:06, 29th May 2025 Already liked by matth1j | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's a phrase that resonated. So much railway land redeveloped for retail, and just occasionally, provision made for a new line through the site.
Galashiels is to some extent a case of "Where there have never been trains, there will be trains", mind, to misquote John Betjeman.
Mark
https://postimg.cc/62Lg43tB
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361829/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 15:49, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be terminated at Swindon.
It will no longer call at Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Dilton Marsh, Warminster and Salisbury.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be terminated at Swindon.
It will no longer call at Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Dilton Marsh, Warminster and Salisbury.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
And now cancelled throughout ... no real difference on the TransWilts section where it was cancelled anyway!
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361828/11010/18] Posted by IndustryInsider at 14:43, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Red/Green crossing lights will need to be installed presumably?
Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025 In "Across the West" [361827/29650/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 14:22, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
........and it's fallen over again.....
Cancellations to services between Slough and London Paddington
Due to urgent repairs to the railway between Slough and London Paddington some lines towards London Paddington are closed.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed by up to 20 minutes or revised.
Disruption is expected until 16:15 29/05.
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361826/11010/18] Posted by matth1j at 13:34, 29th May 2025 Already liked by Mark A, grahame | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is concern at the safety at the level for crossings behind Asda ...
With Asda being our main shop I was surprised to learn that there was a crossing behind it. But having looked at Google satellite view I now know where that gravel path down the side of the car park goes 
https://maps.app.goo.gl/TdaBdE7KTedn9QMN7
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361825/11010/18] Posted by grahame at 13:24, 29th May 2025 Already liked by matth1j, Mark A, Chris from Nailsea | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not up to speed on the details, but "...minor infrastructure upgrades..." - is that accurate?
There is concern at the safety at the level for crossings behind Asda, behind Beanacre Church and the electric substation, and on the path from Shurnhold field to Beanacre. With the extra trains running, and those level walkways classified as having significant pedestrian use, the ORR has specified improvement works. They may be minor in some ways, but those updgrades would cost rather more than my "pocket money".
The northerly and the southerly of those two crossings have already has significant extra barriers put in quite recently, and the fact that it's almost impossible to work out where the public path actually goes across the fields away from them gives lie to "significant pedestrian use". The middle of the three *is* used rather more and hasn't been upgraded - perhaps it does need some attention. Caveat - I am not a safety expert.
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361824/11010/18] Posted by matth1j at 12:55, 29th May 2025 Already liked by RichardB | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not up to speed on the details, but "...minor infrastructure upgrades..." - is that accurate?
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361823/29711/14] Posted by IndustryInsider at 12:07, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, that's a logical interpretation.
2405/2418 are the distant signals (yellow or green only).
2406/2425 are the section signals.
2407/2416 are the signals protecting the junctions (and when a train has passed them it is clear of the section)
The two black boxes between Hanborough and 2418 are the axle counter sections (neither is associated directly with 2418)
I find it a little easier to intepret on SignalMaps than OTT: https://signalmaps.co.uk/#cherval1:1658 You can also see when Ascott has requested a slot for the up direction - the 'AW2406 Release' lights up white.
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361822/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 11:59, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, that makes sense - thanks.
I'd been looking at the map at https://www.opentraintimes.com/maps/signalling/oxford#T_WVCTJN, which has what looked like intermediate signals.
Just looking at options for my usual commute home Bristol-Melksham (on the National Rail website) and of 9 options between 13:00 and 19:25, 4 are currently showing as "This service is cancelled". 2 cancellations are for the Chippenham-Melksham leg, 2 for Trowbridge-Melksham.
It is a "joke" ... a humeourless joke ... today. Goodness knows what has been cancelled and what has been re-instated and what ends up running in the end. It may feel OK to the folks who run the trains to chop and change during the day depending on staff availability - after all, a driver coming in to work at X O'clock doesn't need to know where he's going to be until a few minutes before. However, for passengers (customers) rather more planning is needed, especially on services which are infrequent in the first place. Perhaps more thought should be given to customers and the effect on them of all these "will-it, won't-it" flip-flops.
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361820/29726/18] Posted by matth1j at 11:31, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just looking at options for my usual commute home Bristol-Melksham (on the National Rail website) and of 9 options between 13:00 and 19:25, 4 are currently showing as "This service is cancelled". 2 cancellations are for the Chippenham-Melksham leg, 2 for Trowbridge-Melksham.
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361819/29711/14] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:23, 29th May 2025 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, Timmer | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There were delays from about 15:45-16:15 at Oxford after a freight was stopped for examination after reports of smoke coming from an axle.
Meanwhile, a technical question about signalling on our line.
Yesterday (Wed May 28), I was on the 15:52 back from Paddington. We left Oxford +48, but then sat at Wolvercote for 13 minutes. Looking at OpenTrainTimes, this seemed to be waiting for the halts train, in front of us, to get out of the single track section at Charlbury. We also sat at Ascott, waiting for it to reach Moreton.
Now, looking at OpenTrainTimes, there appear to be intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Charlbury section. My question is this : why could we not have followed the halts train through the suingle track section? We would still have had to wait at Ascott, but at least we'd have got passengers to Hanborough and Charlbury.
Yesterday (Wed May 28), I was on the 15:52 back from Paddington. We left Oxford +48, but then sat at Wolvercote for 13 minutes. Looking at OpenTrainTimes, this seemed to be waiting for the halts train, in front of us, to get out of the single track section at Charlbury. We also sat at Ascott, waiting for it to reach Moreton.
Now, looking at OpenTrainTimes, there appear to be intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Charlbury section. My question is this : why could we not have followed the halts train through the suingle track section? We would still have had to wait at Ascott, but at least we'd have got passengers to Hanborough and Charlbury.
I don't think there are any intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Ascott-under-Wychwood single line. So, heading downwards, a second train cannot leave Wolvercote until a preceding one has cleared Ascott-under-Wychwood and the section is clear
To add to Witham Bobby's post. There are no intermediate signals, other than the colour light distant signals for the signals that protect the junctions at either end. There is an intermediate axle counter section which splits the single line section into two parts, but that hasn't got any signals associated with it.
It's a bit different between Ascott and Moreton-In-Marsh as there are intermediate signals - for the level crossing at Bruern - and again between Moreton and Evesham for Blockley and Chipping Campden L/C's. But these are only to protect the crossings, so trains can't go beyond the section signal of a given box until the train in front is within station limits of the signal box ahead.
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services In "TransWilts line" [361818/11010/18] Posted by grahame at 10:58, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From Brian Mathew's Facebook feed ... icky connection today and I have lost the link ...
Edit - link should be https://www.facebook.com/BrianMathewMP/posts/pfbid04TXxn5pQXNCDEczt3dUwCNa2jjidhCLhMu27SxLY77NgUxprQYxyyhGVNH8HJQRhl

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361817/29711/14] Posted by Witham Bobby at 10:45, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Meanwhile, a technical question about signalling on our line.
Yesterday (Wed May 28), I was on the 15:52 back from Paddington. We left Oxford +48, but then sat at Wolvercote for 13 minutes. Looking at OpenTrainTimes, this seemed to be waiting for the halts train, in front of us, to get out of the single track section at Charlbury. We also sat at Ascott, waiting for it to reach Moreton.
Now, looking at OpenTrainTimes, there appear to be intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Charlbury section. My question is this : why could we not have followed the halts train through the suingle track section? We would still have had to wait at Ascott, but at least we'd have got passengers to Hanborough and Charlbury.
As it was, we got to Charlbury +64 and to Moreton +75.
Yesterday (Wed May 28), I was on the 15:52 back from Paddington. We left Oxford +48, but then sat at Wolvercote for 13 minutes. Looking at OpenTrainTimes, this seemed to be waiting for the halts train, in front of us, to get out of the single track section at Charlbury. We also sat at Ascott, waiting for it to reach Moreton.
Now, looking at OpenTrainTimes, there appear to be intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Charlbury section. My question is this : why could we not have followed the halts train through the suingle track section? We would still have had to wait at Ascott, but at least we'd have got passengers to Hanborough and Charlbury.
As it was, we got to Charlbury +64 and to Moreton +75.
I don't think there are any intermediate signals on the Wolvercote - Ascott-under-Wychwood single line. So, heading downwards, a second train cannot leave Wolvercote until a preceding one has cleared Ascott-under-Wychwood and the section is clear
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [361816/29711/14] Posted by Witham Bobby at 10:32, 29th May 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 12:46 has been cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:29/05/2025 10:02
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:29/05/2025 10:02
13:18 Hereford to London Paddington due 16:24 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:29/05/2025 10:02
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:29/05/2025 10:02